Simon Says » communiqué 015/January 2018

Simon Says: communiqué 015/January 2018

Hello everyone

Happy New Year.

I hope you had a good break and that the holidays brought you everything you could wish for and that you were able to spend time with family and friends. And I trust that 2018 has been kind to you so far.

While we didn’t have a white Christmas in London, we did have snow in December. On one morning there was white stuff on the ground. It didn’t last the day, and it’s now a dim memory, but it still counts as having seen snow, right?

Without Resolution

I don’t like the new year habit of making resolutions. If a change is needed, then it should be made. And that need to change—rather than a digit change on the calendar—should drive the timing of the change.

And I’m no fan of the secondary habit of making public proclamations announcing one’s new resolve. What I intend to achieve is much less interesting than what I actually do.

That said, as I ease slowly into 2018, there are a few things I can be certain about:

Certainty #1: I want to write more and I want to publish more

2018 marks my 30th anniversary of getting paid to write (in one way or another). It’s not news that I’ll keep writing.

As for what I’m writing and when it’s likely to be out… If I intend to write a book, but fail or get distracted, that’s just wasting your time telling you in the first place.

However, when there’s a book that is ready for publication—or when there are extracts or anything tangible to show—you’ll hear about it here first.

Certainty #2: Simon Says will continue

Simon Says is my direct connection with people who read (or might read) my books, and for me, it is my most important publication after my books.

I suspect I’ll spend much less time on social media this year. I already spend little time there, but I aim to spend even less, meaning Simon Says will be even more significant for me.

Certainty #3: I will experiment

I’m also going to try some things.

If any of these experiments succeeds—even if there is only partial success—then I’ll talk about it here. If any of these experiments fail, then I’ll probably quietly forget about them and move on before anyone notices.

What About You?

So how are you in 2018? What’s happening with you? Drop me a line (author AT simon cann dot com) and let me know what’s going on and tell me if there’s anything you want me to talk about in Simon Says.

Causing Offense

From time to time I get questions about “bad” language in my books. There are variants on this question, but it mostly boils down to: will I be offended by something in one of your books, Simon?

What Causes the Offence?

The question of whether someone will be offended is tricky because—like beauty—offense is very much a matter of personal taste and preference, and the factors which may cause offense vary.

Some people are offended simply by the use of “bad” words. Irrespective of how or why the word is used, offense is taken.

This is further complicated in that people have different attitudes to different words—people can be upset by one word, but not another. Offense can also occur when “bad” words are used in a contextually inappropriate manner. People may be (comparatively) relaxed about the use of language where they feel strong words may be justified, but not where the use feels contextually wrong (for instance, swearing at a child).

For others, offense is not taken by bad words. Instead, offense can be taken by apparently clean words being used in a disparaging manner.

And just to be clear, there is no right and wrong here. If you find something offensive, then it is offensive.

Those “Bad” Words…

You will note I’ve talked about bad words and put bad in quotes. As you will have guessed, this is because there is no empirical scale of offense—some words are seen as being mildly offensive, others are felt to be very offensive.

Most offensive words have their roots in one of the following areas:

But the issue is not a simple as: body part reference = offensive (as one example). There is a difference between anatomically labeling a body part and using a slang term for the same part. The biological label may be acceptable where the slang term may cause offense.

While not getting into the specifics of offensive language, if you’re looking for a sensible, dispassionate take on what language is considered offensive and what isn’t, Ofcom (Office of the Communications Regulator, the UK communications regulator) published a report in 2016 about Attitudes to potentially offensive language and gestures on TV and radio.

This report is a good starting place for considering which words may cause offense. However, before you click the link, I must caution you that there are a lot of “bad” words in there. If you are liable to take offense, please don’t follow the link. Then again, if you’re looking for new and different ways to offend, that report is made for you and will provide some useful additions to your vocabulary.

Why Use Bad Language

So—as an author—if I know that there are words and phrases that offend people, why don’t I just avoid them? It is easy to avoid giving any offense, so why go near the edge?

The answer is short and simple: because using colorful language has a dramatic purpose.

Bad language can connote many facets, for instance it can show immaturity in a character, a lack of education, habitual behavior, or a need (on the part of the character) to conform to social norms.

Equally, language can show aggression or poor impulse control. But most significantly, it will often demonstrate anger or extreme emotional distress, particularly with a character whose language has previously been restrained. If a father watches as his daughter is murdered, you wouldn’t expect him to say: “Oh dear, that’s a pity.”

If a character is going to be harassed or threatened, then typically, the antagonist’s choice of words will not be polite. If a character is suffering, then there will be some ugly words, and if the language doesn’t reflect a credible exchange, then the reader will have difficulty suspending their disbelief.

My Choices

I can use any words, but what do I do in practice?

For me, as an author, nothing is off limits—I want to paint with all the colors. For each character, there are gradations of emotions and one way to show a character under duress is through the change in their speech patter, including but not exclusively, through the change in their choice of words. Therefore, when warranted by the situation, my characters will use bad language.

But the use of bad language is, in my opinion, moderate.

To my mind, bad language gets old very fast and once I’ve gone as far as language will take me, there is nowhere else to go, so I only want to go to the maximum when the story needs me to do so.

Let me give you an example of what I see as moderate. In Bag Man, one of those bad words is used. Of all the words that people tend to find particularly offensive, just one is used, and then it is used in a single instance. Within the context of the situation in which Leathan Wilkey finds himself, I think the use is justified and shows the reader Leathan’s emotional state in the way that descriptive text would fail to capture.

Will you be offended by the language in my books? Maybe, but I hope not. Or at least, I hope you will agree that any offense reflects what the character feels and is justified within the context.

Simon Said Last Year

If you’re new to the readers’ group and this is your first edition (or one of your first editions) of Simon Says, then be sure to download Simon Says 2017. This is a compilation of Simon Says articles from 2017.

Here you’ll find:

This collection has been collated by subject to give a smoother reading experience (you don’t have to cross-reference from one month to another). 

Forward to February

There’s no chat about my books this month, but you know where you can find details, right?

I’ll be back in February.

All the best